YOU ARE NOW READING

Change Management: Bitter Pill or Sweet Candy?

Change Management.jpg

CIOs cannot avoid change management as they are at the forefront of process and technology. Managing change, that too amidst resistance and organizational politics, has never been an easy task. It required specialized skills to handle. Successful changes were those where the change endeavors has overcome the resistance or have circumvented it. Without a strong sponsor and commitment from the top, change management could be a touch journey. Needless to say, traditionally the change management followed a top down approach. I call the traditional change management compulsive as it may not be acceptable to all initially and requires carefully crafted approach for its success.

The mindset, expectations and behavior patterns are changing rapidly for the consumer of service. What is true for Gen X may not be true for Gen Y. The same old techniques of change may not work well today. Today, business is more like an ecosystem and organizations are like communities. There is a need to adopt a different strategy by exploiting the strengths and weaknesses of existing environment.

Fortunately commoditization of IT and democratization of information has given us excellent opportunities to drive change management. My recent experiences with these concepts and using them in driving cultural change have been very encouraging. When we failed to drive a particular initiative through a compulsive change, we thought of changing the approach rather than trying harder with conventional approach. We collected feedback and views from end users as how they see a successful change and implemented those through iterative method. In addition we gave the power to end users to refine approach and play with the change. We experimented by combining the change with a lot of fun, empowerment and engagement and the results were very positive. The adaptation for change was very quick and evolutionary contrary to conventional approaches which were having limited success. I call it collaborative change where everyone can participate in a democratic fashion.

The concept of collaborative change revolves around basic instinct of humans to collaborate and be recognized. It gives the opportunity to the community to participate and provide inputs to change. With empowerment and engagement, the revolution starts from bottom and change becomes natural outcome. The role of the initiator or change manager is to channel the inputs towards a goal and initiate the debate on a particular change before executing it.

 Differences between compulsive and collaborative chang

Compulsive Change

Collaborative Change

Change is revolutionary

Change is evolutionary

Resistance is high

Resistance is low

Change flows from top

Change flows from bottom

Adoption and acceptance is late towards the end of transformation

Early adoption and follows iterative improvements

Chances of success is low

Chances of success is high

Strong sponsor and senior management commitment is a must

Everyone is catalyst and hence senior management support is not mandatory

 

In my opinion, the collaboration tools provide effective medium for CIOs to drive the change. Smartphones, tablets and other devices fuel the adoption if the concept of collaboration and gaming against the change is channelized properly. At the end, any change is collective opinion of the community called organization and I have seen people really enjoy participating and take the ownership of adoption. For such changes, there is more pull then push. IT leaders need to empower, engage and align the community and adopt an umpiring role in change management rather than playing on the ground. 


ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR

D D Mishra is the Founder & Managing Consultant at CIOSpecialist. Prior to this, he was the Head of IT Governance & Outsourcing at Vodafone Essar Limited. ...

More about  D D Mishra
WHAT OUR READERS ARE SAYING..

This post has received 2 Comments

I agree with Mr. Mishra in principle, but I would recommend a third path to follow, depending on company size and anticipated change amount and frequency. Just as a PMO is important for establishing methodologies, standards, and governance, a Change Management Office (CMO) is important for the same reasons. Without attention to these guidelines there is no help with making sure the organization is ready for your delivery.

The job of the CMO is to promote change awareness and assist with the impact to/by company culture, business process change, business model change, Communication, job change, employee and company readiness, etc. The CMO determines how much change can be absorbed in a particular timeframe.

I have deployed major programs with and without this assistance. I can tell you I definitely prefer to have it!

@Sherre - This is a brilliant piece of input for me and thanks a ton for this suggestion. A great suggestion unconvetional one indeed as I never saw anyone talking about it.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Dynamic Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter and get news and articles right in your inbox: